Talk:Military ranks of the Netherlands armed forces

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Military ranks of the Netherlands armed forces article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Culture / Dutch / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force
	Dutch military history task force
	European military history task force

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Comments

...

English Equivilent

Is this the equivilent in the British Forces or just the translation?Feeblezak 20:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kolonellucht.png

Image:Kolonellucht.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kolonellucht.png

Image:Kolonellucht.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:14, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New STANAG comparisons

Hi there, I have recently found this document (here at page 10 and 11); and it seem that the rank of Stafadjutant is no longer in use, so the Templates on en.wiki, fr.wiki and nl.wiki about the NATO STANAG ranks comparisons need to be updated on their OR-8 and OR-9. Thank you in advance! --82.55.70.212 (talk) 14:50, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A rather late response 82.55.70.212 the rank of Stafadjutant still exists according to the article. You have them in various degrees (unit, base and command Stafadjudanten) but they are addressed as "Adjudant" as the "staf" part is more a seniority aspect, rather than an actual rank - BramvR (talk) 19:36, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aruba, Curacao, and St. Maartin Volunteer Corps

Hi, the Dutch West Indies islands of Aruba, Curacao, and St. Maartin also have locally recruited volunteer defense forces called Vrijwilligers Korps/Volunteer Corps. They fall under the command of the Royal Netherlands Marine Corps and judging from their websites it looks like they use the same ranks and rank insignia as the marines. The Dutch West Indies also has a Coast Guard but that is under the control of, and part of the Royal Netherlands Navy. 24.46.236.67 (talk) 21:43, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Military ranks of the Dutch armed forces. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commander in Chief?

The Dutch King hasn't been the Commander in Chief since constitutional revisions in 1983. Article 97.2 says the Dutch Government has Supreme Authority over the Armed Forces. of which the Chief of Defense exercises on behalf. The King was given special insignias to wear on his uniforms as King. those insignia's aren't ranks or titles of office. CharlesViBritannia (talk) 19:28, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed - in the Netherlands the ceremonial head of state is indeed that, ceremonial, the government (as a board of ministers) is collectively the commander in chief. I changed the erroneous text. Arnoutf (talk) 16:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]