Talk:Military impostor

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Military impostor article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Culture Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force

"Notable" individuals

I wanted to head off a potential problem regarding the list of "notables." There is a potential for violation of WP:BLP and various policies on libel if names are added to this without caution. Hence I have suggested that only persons who are both notable to have articles about them, and have confessed or been convicted by a court of law should be included. The following individuals, while certainly military imposters, are not included both due to the lack of confessions or convictions, and due to them being otherwise completely unremarkable individuals that, from my understanding of WP:NOTEBIO, should never have had articles in the first place:

As noted by WP:PERP and WP:PERSISTENCE, being an imposter in and of itself is not grounds for being considered notable, even if there is a fair bit of contemporary news converge.Legitimus (talk) 18:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List class

Should this article be a list class article? It does have a section listing individuals who are known to have pretended to be be serving or former military personnel. However, the bulk of it is describing the phenomenon, the psychological motivations for doing it, possible legal consequences and so on. It just seems to be a regular article.Catsmeat (talk) 10:57, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's list class. Is it classified as such somewhere?Legitimus (talk) 13:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When I look at it, the article is headed with A list-class article from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. I'm not sure how to change that.Catsmeat (talk) 19:12, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see this heading in main article or the talk page. Perhaps it's some kind of setting you have on?Legitimus (talk) 19:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it. Auntieruth55 marked it as list-class last year. What's odd is that it didn't say list class on the talk page for me, it said start. What Catsmeat is referring to is a gadget (found under the preferences menu) where you can see the assessment on the article page, versus looking at the talk page. I've rated the article at "C" because it doesn't yet meet "B" criteria. (MILHIST doesn't use the C-class so it shows "Start" instead.) The reason why is that I think more coverage of the history of this practice should be included compared with the GWOT era examples. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There's a few from WWII and Vietnam in the notables list, but I will do my best to go back farther and find what I can. Right now, it seems it's just me working on this, and I freely admit I'm a non-vet trying to cover a vet topic (my involvement comes from the mental health and sociological aspects), so please elaborate on anything you would like to be added.Legitimus (talk) 21:59, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Military imposter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140115094848/http://www.justice.gov/usao/nce/press/2005/2005-Apr-07.html to http://www.justice.gov/usao/nce/press/2005/2005-Apr-07.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]