Talk:Military Peace Establishment Act

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 16, 2020.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States / Napoleonic era Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

Untitled

New sources and opinions are welcomed. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 21:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because...

It contains the actual text of the Act, and will contain information not found in the West Point article. Frankly, the article was nomonated for speedy deletion only minutes after it was created, and before anyone (familiar with early American history) had a chance to see what sort of in depth coverage the article will contain. There was much talk with Jefferson, Washington, Henry Dearborn and others that brought about the Military Peace Establishment Act -- many points of context that are not covered in the West point article. It almost seems that a bot came along and nominated it for deletion. Please give the article a chance before rushing in and deleting this article. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 21:12, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@HappyValleyEditor:. Well, I was all set to start covering things in depth, but I guess now I'll just have to wait rather than waste my time adding in dept coverage only to see it deleted. How familiar are you with this subject? How did you come to make a decision for nomination in only a couple of minutes after this page was created? What is the hurry? Please give the article a chance before jumping to a decision. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 21:19, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I see an IP user came in and removed the Speedy Deletion tag. Does this mean that the nomination for speedy deletion is officially cancelled? I'd like to know so I can continue work on the article knowing I'm not wasting my time. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 21:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]