Jump to content

Talk:Mikhail Lesin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gazprom Media Activities

[edit]

Interesting relationship graph: http://www.forbes.ru/sites/default/files/users/user149255/Screen_Shot_2014-09-19_at_15.09.33.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.91.241.108 (talk) 07:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Religion

[edit]

What was his religion? --2003:8B:8F61:F28:94B8:5FB6:A414:D533 (talk) 03:17, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Over-reference

[edit]

I count 20 references in the Death section concerning the simple announcement yesterday that he died of blunt force trauma. There will be much more on this story in the future. A few better sources is better than lots of sources. -- GreenC 03:21, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since I posted the above yesterday, we are now up to 33 different references. Most of these should be deleted, there is no need to present a wall of references. This is not an archive of every source in every language that mentions Mikhail Lesin's death. -- GreenC 02:47, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Should Vladimir Gusinsky and Mikhail Lesin contain a "See also" link to Michael R. Caputo? It was added by IP, removed by me, and re-added by IP. Now we discuss.

To me it looks like WP:OR (Original Research) trying to highlight a connection between these individuals. See also can be misused giving too much WP:WEIGHT for some other agenda. If there was a reason to link to them, why isn't it discussed in the main text with sources? Where are the sources that shows a substantial link between these three? -- GreenC 14:18, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Garbage

[edit]

The article contains a lot of garbage added by a Long Term Abuse account User talk:67.53.214.86. Nothing they did should be assumed to be accurate reflection of the sources, or relevant to the article. It goes back to 2017. -- GreenC 17:52, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removed some, but still a lot of source-stuffing with a single fact having 6-12 sources, much of it in Russian, which English readers will have trouble accessing; it's unclear why we need Russian sources when an English source is verifiable. -- GreenC 18:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]