This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
I looked at that USPTO search, and it looks as if for some of the inventions, e.g. #17 in the list, there is more than one inventor shown in the "Inventors:" line lower down, but the "Inventor" field (which is searched on) simply reads "Keith, Michael et al". Does this imply that Keith might be listed as a non-primary co-inventor on other Intel patents? Should we then call him "primary inventor" in this article? Rpresser16:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Studying the list further, some of the 100 hits have him as a co-inventor but not the first inventor listed, and the "IN" field seems to be always the first inventor alphabetically, so there's no "primary inventor" as there is a primary author on scholarly papers. Therefore I'm editing the article to say "inventor or co-inventor." Rpresser16:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
