Talk:Mike Cowlishaw
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Career at IBM
[edit]Mike will take early retirement from IBM March 5. Avihu (talk) 06:17, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
References
[edit]Two (numbered) web references after all (unnumbered) papers in "References" are slightly odd. How about merging the two "books" and all papers into a new section "publications", keep the two numbered references as "references", and move the "external links" (home page + Acorn 1) to the end? –Be..anyone (talk) 08:57, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Good stuff. Widefox; talk 11:53, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Last EL killed, I've added the Acorn 1 detail to "non-IBM", and the homepage is obviously used in almost all references. The problem here are not exactly the primary sources: The details like RFC 1945 (section acknowledgments, he is listed) also exist elsewhere, but his site presents it better. All those standards of course exist, and a part of the self-published sources is "peer reviewed", as good (or bad, depending) as 3rd party references. But if somebody pulls the plug on his server those sources need work, hopefully they are archived. –Be..anyone (talk) 12:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- It is exactly that we base articles on WP:secondary. Undoubtedly notable person. Widefox; talk 17:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Last EL killed, I've added the Acorn 1 detail to "non-IBM", and the homepage is obviously used in almost all references. The problem here are not exactly the primary sources: The details like RFC 1945 (section acknowledgments, he is listed) also exist elsewhere, but his site presents it better. All those standards of course exist, and a part of the self-published sources is "peer reviewed", as good (or bad, depending) as 3rd party references. But if somebody pulls the plug on his server those sources need work, hopefully they are archived. –Be..anyone (talk) 12:55, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Computing articles
- Mid-importance Computing articles
- C-Class software articles
- Mid-importance software articles
- C-Class software articles of Mid-importance
- All Software articles
- C-Class Computer science articles
- Low-importance Computer science articles
- All Computing articles
- Articles with connected contributors