Talk:Mike Carlton

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mike Carlton article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Mike Carlton is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

POV

This article seems somewhat biased to me... phrases such as "In a desperate bid to reverse the downward trend..." "...night time announcer Stan Zemanek claiming he should be hosting breakfast...". - ||| antiuser (talk) (contribs) 06:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to Be Bold and remove unverified, original research. Jpe|ob 07:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not familiar enough with the subject to do it, just thought I'd point it out. - ||| antiuser (talk) (contribs) 03:20, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think someone's fixed it, i removed the POV tag, seems fine now. {Truth 06 02:08, 30 November 2006 (UTC)}[reply]

Zemanek feud

I replaced the claim that "Carlton's career is on the line" with "the Daily Telegraph claims that his career is on the line". There's a big difference. We don't know whether or not Carlton's career is on the line, but we can say that The Daily Telegraph claims this. 203.217.56.152 23:05, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Labor supporter?

The opening lines of the article state Carlton is a Labor supporter. A reference is provided, but I can't find the line that says he's a Labor supporter. Maybe I missed it. Even if it was cited, shouldn't the line be worded in past tense, as he could change his allegiance at any time.--Lester 04:19, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed it. [1] in fact suggests otherwise, but I've left this ref out for the time being. How does it sound now? Recurring dreams 08:19, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rearranged and reworded a few pieces of the text to flow better and added some material regarding his early career. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onamission2000 (talk • contribs) 11:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I dont believe he is a Labor supporter and he was close to the Police Commissioner Ryan's wife who was very anti-ALP. I am looking up references to confirm this —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.175.230 (talk) 05:11, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Akerman comments

I have corrected the reference link to Akerman's comments which was a duplicate of the one following. Having therefore read the comments in context, I wonder whether they are notable enough for inclusion in the article. As part of an extended debate on media and immigration issues, the ABC played a single-line quote from Akerman attacking Carlton, followed by a single-line quote of Carlton attacking Akerman. Neither quote was integral to the debate, and both were used as examples of exaggerated hyperbole in media comment. Neither quote subsequently led to any media coverage or public debate.

I haven't removed the quote because I'm interested in other's opinions on its relevance in the context of this stub-like article, or whether inclusion is placing undue weight on a throwaway line from a media competitor. Any thoughts? Euryalus (talk) 04:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of any other opinions over the last month, I've removed the Akerman quote as giving undue weight to a passing mention. I have also integrated the "Controversy" section into the body of the article. "Controversy" sections tend to end up as a repository for every critical media mention for a public figure, and also isolate any relevant material from the context of the main biography. Lastly I have updated the Zemanek paragraph given the passage of time (ie. the Telegraph's prediction that he would be immediately sacked did not eventuate).

Happy to discuss any of these changes if there are opposing views. Euryalus (talk) 22:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Early career

What is a giver and taker?˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redactor33 (talk • contribs) 01:32, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk show host

"As well as Carlton himself, most of the other characters in the segment were portrayed by Australian actor and television personality Josh Zepps." What is this sentence trying to say? Zepps portrayed Carlton?˜˜˜˜ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redactor33 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mike Carlton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080829104559/http://news.smh.com.au/national/smh-columnist-carlton-sacked-over-strike-20080829-458a.html to http://news.smh.com.au/national/smh-columnist-carlton-sacked-over-strike-20080829-458a.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:46, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]