Jump to content

Talk:Mihailo Obrenović, Prince of Serbia/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Untitled

At the end of the VfD period there were no votes. I therefore exercised my own right to vote (making it one each - me and the nominator). I found a reference to this guy and wrote a ministub.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael I of Serbia

DJ Clayworth 21:56, 23 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Requested move 17 April 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)MaterialWorks (contribs) 18:23, 24 April 2023 (UTC)


Mihailo ObrenovićMihailo Obrenović, Prince of Serbia – The main reason motivating this proposed move is establishing a consistency in article titles that cover ruling Princes of Serbia. A few weeks ago, this page and Miloš Obrenović, Prince of Serbia were the only pages that did not conform to this format. The page for Miloš Obrenović was recently moved to the current format after a proposed move discussion and the resulting article name was one that the editors either explicitly agreed on, were willing to accept or addressed their opposing thoughts. One editor explicitly proposed addressing this page should the page for Miloš Obrenović be moved the way it was ultimately agreed upon. I'd like to note that ruling Princes of Monaco, an existing principality, follow this format in page titles. Killuminator (talk) 16:53, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Strong support per WP:SOVEREIGNS. Estar8806 (talk) 21:06, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Support per WP:SOVEREIGN and WP:CONSISTENCY with other Serbian princes. I don't think that "conciseness" is a virtue that should be regarded independently from the other four criteria, and we have specialized naming conventions that implement the broader consensus how the criteria should be weighed in a specific field. No such user (talk) 10:30, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.