Talk:Mid Glamorgan
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
We could do with something about how controversial Mid Glamorgan was : I can fish this out from Hansard. It was really quite poor compared to South Glamorgan - the latter only had two districts and was accused of being a proxy for Cardiff County Borough. Morwen - Talk 12:10, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Morganwg [Glamorgan county as a whole] was one of the ancient Princedoms of Wales and for 'old' and proud residents, still exists as an indisoluble entity, political mapping, 'unitary-authority' expediency and gerymandering notwithstanding. The Welsh, being essentially 'tribal' and partisan, are inordineraly proud of their heritage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.200.108.57 (talk) 14:46, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mid Glamorgan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728154121/http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_population/Mid_2007_UK_England_%26_Wales_Scotland_and_Northern_Ireland%20_21_08_08.zip to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_population/Mid_2007_UK_England_%26_Wales_Scotland_and_Northern_Ireland%20_21_08_08.zip
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)