Talk:Microsoft Visual C Sharp
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
comment
[edit]WHen I created this topic, I meant for it to to contain content specific to the MS implementation of C#. So far, there have been no contributions that need to go here, vs. there. That article will probably remain quite short, just describing the distinction between the two. But I think it's useful, and should not be merged. Leotohill 16:08, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
A merge of this article with C_Sharp has been discussed and rejected. If you would like to re-open the discussion please do so at talk:C_Sharp.
Visual C# as an IDE
[edit]VC# is not the C# language, but the IDE to develop C# on Windows. Still the .NET SDK is a prerequisite to be able to develop with this IDE. I changed the beginning of the article because I feel it was confusing to the reader. Feel free to revert if I'm wrong. Hervegirod 10:41, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, the language itself is called "visual c#". This can be confirmed by running the command line compiler csc.exe - its signature line is "Microsoft Visual C#". I'll revert your changes. Leotohill 04:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Please expand article
[edit]Particularly differences between VC# and C#. Thanks Jon 21:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- There are no differences. C# is the specification, VC# is the implementation by Microsoft. Leotohill (talk) 16:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Article name
[edit]Is it valid to refer to the language as Visual C# and skip the Microsoft part? --Stefán Örvarr Sigmundsson 21:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
- As the article explains, almost any reference to "C#" means "Visual C#", so in most contexts there is no difference. C# is the spec, Visual C# the primary implementation of the spec. If someone comes up with a C# implementation that differs significantly from the specification (could they, and still call it C#?) then the article on that one could describe its differences. This article is meant to be short and sweet. Leotohill (talk) 01:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Article name technical restriction
[edit]Shouldn't we be using the ♯ character instead of # in the article name? I thought according to the language spec the character in the name was in fact a "musical sharp" and not a number sign (or "pound" sign). Would this get around the technical restriction? MetaFight (talk) 20:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
File:Logo C Sharp.png Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:Logo C Sharp.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Logo C Sharp.png) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:11, 31 March 2012 (UTC) |
Merge?
[edit]Anybody thinking about merging this article into C#?Thomas J. S. Greenfield (talk) 09:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)