Talk:Microsoft Sans Serif

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Microsoft: Windows Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Microsoft Windows (assessed as Low-importance).

Gone in Vista?

Is the original raster version of MS Sans Serif gone in Vista? I don't have a copy of Vista to check... --Nyletak ♥

I would expect this to be true as MS Sans Serif is not a True Type Font, Microsoft Sans Serif is. Vista tried to ditch all .fon fonts -NeF (talk) 00:36, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about Win7?

I've looped through InstalledFontCollection() in C# .NET and in my Windows 7 Professional OS, there is no FontFamily named "MS Sans Serif". Instead there is "MS Reference Sans Serif" and "Microsoft Sans Serif". When I request the "MS Sans Serif" font using the C++ Windows SDK CreateFont("MS Sans Serif", 8) function, I do get a font, and based on things I've seen on other discussion boards, it would appear that it is the "MS Reference Sans Serif" font, since it behaves like a raster font, not a truetype font (see note from User Nyltak above) It would be helpful if someone from Microsoft would confirm (or deny) that Microsoft has replaced "MS Sans Serif" with "MS Reference Sans Serif" as of Windows 7 or some such statement.Sloughin (talk) 16:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Font preview

Not unsurprisingly, the font preview displays on my computer (Firefox 2 on Ubuntu Gutsy) as Bitstream Vera Serif. I imagine the MS Sans Serif preview will only work on Windows, and the other one will additionally work on Leopard, but nothing else. I've added a technical note (in a {{selfref}} tag) to this effect, but what's really needed is an image illustrating it. Hairy Dude (talk) 23:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I too wondered why there was a warning stating that the fonts had to be on my computer... why isn't it an image this would rectify the situation.-NeF (talk) 00:29, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is quite broken. I've just removed it and pasted it below. Someone needs to render the font into an image as it is done on other articles. This is pretty unprofessional and broken. —mako ๛ 20:19, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

== Font preview == {{selfref|Technical note: These previews will display correctly only in operating systems containing these fonts; otherwise the font used is likely the browser's default text font.}} ===MS Sans Serif=== <span style="font: 24pt MS Sans Serif">The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. 1234567890</span> ===Microsoft Sans Serif=== <span style="font: 24pt Microsoft Sans Serif">The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. 1234567890</span>

Helvetica

Should it be pointed out that the font is extremely similar to Helvetica (much more so than Arial), and the former name of "Helv" makes it even more obvious that this is the case? Avatar-X (talk) 03:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I came to this page was to find out how obviously similar these fonts are.

http://www.identifont.com/samples/microsoft/MicrosoftSansSerif.gif

http://www.identifont.com/samples/adobe/Helvetica.gif

Having these 2 fonts in different tabs and cycling between them shows the very subtle differences. Please do mention it in the article.-NeF (talk) 00:31, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bundled With Font

"On October 16, 2007, Apple announced on their website that the next version of their flagship operating system, Mac OS X v10.5 ("Leopard"), would be bundled with Microsoft Sans Serif." [link]

So, if I buy the font I get OS X for free? L2Grammar - Avitor (talk) 00:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT? 217.99.254.168 (talk) 14:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.ascendercorp.com/msfonts/ms_sans.html
Triggered by \bascendercorp\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 18:20, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 05:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 17:54, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Microsoft Sans Serif. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081215210759/http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/300.html to https://www.apple.com/macosx/features/300.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]