Talk:Microsoft Office 2004 for Mac

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Microsoft Office 2004 for Mac article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Apple Inc. Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Microsoft

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Updates no longer available

All Updates are no longer available from Microsoft website. Censorship (from inside WP) does not allow to give this information in the article itself. --ProloSozz (talk) 11:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The other editor says it is available. Do you have a source for your claim? FleetCommand (Speak your mind!) 07:56, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you or the other editor have a source from where the updates can be downloaded? Here is a nice presentation what updates should be installed. Microsoft does no longer offer them (all attempts result in error 404 (file not found); and the wayback-machine (interet archive) only saved the webpage, but not the update file! There is no need for a "source that claims that the updates are no longer available". There is the need for the links to the updates to prove that the updates are still available! You (and the other editor) are warmly invited to pesent the links where the updates are still downloadable! If they no longer exist, the information that the they are no longer availalbe, has to be mentioned in the article. Btw: updates for other (older) office suites from Microsoft are still available for download! --ProloSozz (talk) 09:07, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Btw: yes, I have a source (but you won't accept it as valuable): the transcript of a Microsoft support chat. They state clearly that this product is no longer supported, mention a link to the (nonworking) downloads, and if you contest that the link does not work, the answer is that the product is no longer supported and to look in forum; and in forum the problem is the same: people contest that the updates are no longer available, and the answer is none or "no longer supported" ... --ProloSozz (talk) 10:58, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the "warm" invitation, but I will not interfere in your affairs. Because, first, the burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material and second, there are indications that the problem here is not your statement alone but also you yourself. I suspect you have done something very upsetting to other editor. If I had to guess I'd say you reported him to Arbitration Committee?

Either leave the matter for a while (say a weeks or so) and try again later, or somehow make up to the other editor. And remember, it is impossible to avoid an editor with whom you have a problem. You will eventually run into him again, and again, and again, and again. You might as well learn the art of dispute resolution. FleetCommand (Speak your mind!) 19:06, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 July 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SkyWarrior 03:16, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Office 2004 for Mac → Microsoft Office 2004 for Mac – Please move this page to "Microsoft Office 2004 for Mac", to keep it in line with the pages for other Office editions. Thank you! 93.44.108.28 (talk) 09:13, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support move per nom for consistency. O.N.R. ^(talk) 13:49, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per nom.Fade258 (talk) 15:40, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"Microsoft® Office 2004 for Mac" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Microsoft® Office 2004 for Mac and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Microsoft® Office 2004 for Mac until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 04:59, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]