Talk:Microsoft NetMeeting

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Microsoft Windows: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Should this article be called Windows NetMeeting instead of Microsoft NetMeeting? Even official Microsoft material flip-flops between the two, so I'm not sure. But the official logo, clearly visible in the article, labels it as "Windows NetMeeting." NetMeeting's "About" window calls it "Windows NetMeeting," in text and not just in the logo. On the other hand, Google comes up with 5.805556 times as many results for "Microsoft NetMeeting" as "Windows NetMeeting." Still, I'd go with what the logo & About page say. Any comments/suggestions? --Tophtucker 17:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MS Netmeeting lawsuit.

This might be worth mentioning:

http://www.itworld.com/App/4155/031125netmeeting/

"NetMeeting's retirement is unrelated to a patent infringement lawsuit involving the product that Microsoft lost earlier this month, the company said. A jury ordered the software maker to pay US$62.3 million in damages for infringing on a technology patent held by a division of manufacturing and technology company SPX Corp." '''i believe that it should be called Windows NetMeeting'''

Fair use rationale for Image:NetMeeting.PNG

Image:NetMeeting.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

netmeeting and IE/Windows Explorer

Since I installed Netmeeting on XP, Windows Explorer has an Internet Explorer title bar. I take this to mean that Netmeeting integration in Windows Explorer is handled by Internet Explorer, but I haven't been able to find any details. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.166.15 (talk) 00:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History?

This article doesn't really describe the history of the product at all. It really should, just like the article on Windows Live Messenger does. --129.21.225.231 (talk) 19:27, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disable?

No, i wouldnt rec it. All the losers on the internet tell you to disable this function but it is required for system stability when playing games or surfing the net i think mostly if you own a custom mb which takes small amounts of ram. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.255.42.105 (talk) 16:28, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hilal

co1 co2 co3 co4 co5 co6 co7 co8 co9 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.139.87.230 (talk) 09:14, 27 October 2009 (UTC) panda9014321304 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.112.177 (talk) 05:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NetMeeting in XP Mode lacks the ability to share

The current post says that all NetMeeting capability is available to Windows 7 users within XP Mode. I believe you'll find that using XP Mode the share button is dim, and you are unable to share. You can participate in meetings, though. This is exactly the same limitaiton you get when you RDP into an XP machine to run NetMeeting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.170.128.65 (talk) 20:46, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Microsoft NetMeeting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160111091814/https://support.microsoft.com/kb/927853 to https://support.microsoft.com/kb/927853

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:12, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]