Talk:Microsoft Lumia 540

Microsoft Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Telecommunications Low‑importance

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please only add content if you can provide a citation.

If you can't back up your claim I will delete it from the article, please provide a citation. --LyThienDao1984 (talk) 05:48, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Windows 10.

The section that speaks of Windows 10 upgradability makes no mention of the Insider preview but the actual update, these are 2 completely different things. --Hoang the Hoangest (talk) 05:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Careless reversion almost to the level of Codename Lisa.

@ScrapIronIV: When doing reverts you should check for other edits first, my addition of adding Microsoft Cortana to the text was a description of the image and its reversion was completely unnecessary, as for reverting me and warning me for supposed uncited news, the Lumia Conversations source already mentions its upgradability to Windows 10 Mobile, I just added another source in case you'd revert again. Note that the other editor confused the availability of the Windows Insider Preview with the actual announcement of its future upgradability which as I've mentioned above are 2 completely different things, as for unsourced material there is way more unsourced on this page, yet you would rather revert an image description than actually add sources or even remove the other content yourself. --Hoang the Hoangest (talk) 11:05, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see that someone removed the earlier Lumia Conversations source as well, note that the Indian IP editor is known for carelessly removing content without checking any of the sources, the claim is not unsourced. --Hoang the Hoangest (talk) 11:07, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Receptions are a normal part of phone articles.

@ScrapIronIV: reviews are included for literally every other article see iPhone, Samsung Galaxy S5, Huawei Ascend Mate, Etc. Either delete it on every phone article on Wikipedia or don't delete it at all, what you're doing is edit warring and you didn't quote any Wiki rules. As I can see from editors above you're very unlikely to read let alone respond to any messages so I'm probably talking to deaf ears. --42.113.156.106 (talk) 01:17, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]