Talk:Microraptoria

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Avoid Weasel Words

Many researchers feel these taxa actually represent a paraphyletic series of basal members of Deinonychosauria (and or Avialae). "Many researches" is weasley. Please be specific (who feels this way, exactly) and provide a cite, or don't include it.Dinoguy2 14:01, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Microraptoria or Microraptorinae

On Wikipedia, Microraptoria is generally being used instead of Microraptorinae, and this page says, "Sereno offered a revised definition of the sub-group containing Microraptor to ensure that it would fall within Dromaeosauridae, and erected the subfamily Microraptorinae, attributing it to Senter et al., though this usage has only appeared on his online TaxonSearch database and has not been formally published." As far as I've seen, this is very outdated, and Microraptorinae is the name for this group that's normally used in papers for quite some time now. I can't remember the last time I saw Microraptoria used. As one example, on the Changyuraptor Wikipedia page it says, "C. yangi belongs to the group of dromaeosaurid theropod dinosaurs called the Microraptoria.", with the reference that follows being the paper that names Changyuraptor. But in this paper, "Microraptoria" doesn't appear even once. Instead, Microraptorinae is the name that's used. It's counterproductive if these animals are being referred to by one name on Wikipedia, but by another name in papers published for some years now. 94.14.155.21 (talk) 14:05, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Microraptoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090115093329/http://www.taxonsearch.org/Archive/stem-archosauria-1.0.php to http://www.taxonsearch.org/Archive/stem-archosauria-1.0.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]