Talk:Microbiotheria

Mammals: Monotremes and Marsupials Mid‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Monotremes and Marsupials (assessed as Mid-importance).

Palaeontology Mid‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I added some results of the 2010 study showing microbiothere geographical origins, along with other early marsupials, in South America, but I did not transfer the source from the 'monito del monte' page. Could someone else do that please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elisevil (talk • contribs) 05:04, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Microbiotheria

An article that you have been involved in editing—Microbiotheria —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Gdog1102 (talk) 17:17, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Microbiotheriidae article can be easily covered under this page, as the two are very closly related and both of the pages are extremely short. Gdog1102 (talk) 17:14, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to not mergeGdog1102 (talk) 21:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On the other hand, if someone in the future wants to go into detail on the extinct taxa within these groups, it would be better to keep them separate. WolfmanSF (talk) 16:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Microbiotheriidae is a group within Microbiotheria. Instead of merging we could perhaps rewrite the articles to be more specific and create articles for the other groups within Microbiotheria. At the moment they comprise of the exact same information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdog1102 (talk • contribs) 20:23, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, because of the way the Microbiotheriidae article was created. I'm pressed for time at the moment and editing these articles is low on my priorities. I or someone else will probably get to it eventually. WolfmanSF (talk) 21:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No merge then. I'll edit the articles some and start expanding them.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Microbiotheria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060927212513/http://www.fmnh.helsinki.fi/users/haaramo/Metazoa/Deuterostoma/Chordata/Synapsida/Metatheria/Notometatheria/Microbiotheria.html to http://www.fmnh.helsinki.fi/users/haaramo/metazoa/Deuterostoma/Chordata/Synapsida/Metatheria/Notometatheria/Microbiotheria.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]