Jump to content

Talk:Mick Gatto

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Deletion of unsourced material

[edit]

I've removed large chunks of material from this article because of WP:BLP concerns. Any claims that could be construed as defamatory - e.g. allegations of criminal behaviour - MUST be properly sourced. I realise that this cuts out a lot of important content, and I have no doubt that suitable sources could be found for some of these claims, but I don't have the time to go chasing them now - feel free to re-add it with appropriate sourcing. --GenericBob (talk) 01:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On a quick search I couldn't find anything obvious for 'Tommy Ramsay', so I've deleted this bit too. --GenericBob (talk) 11:20, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted to "businessman": As the sources provided do not support use of (libelous, I think?), "mobster", this edit has been reverted. It would likely contravene WP:BLP. Of course, add it back if there's a reliable source for it. 122.105.94.165 (talk) 12:48, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, not sure why the love affair with "mobster" being put into article, but don't think it's quite right, in terms of WP:BLP. Reverted to ". . . who is widely suspected of being involved in the Melbourne underworld" version again, which should be sufficient to convey a similar concept. Why the insistence on the non-NPOV - and unsourced - "mobster"? 49.177.64.138 (talk) 12:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Defamtion loss - underworld figure.[1] 49.177.61.250 (talk) 12:31, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Cooper, Adam (26 February 2021). "Mick Gatto loses defamation proceedings against ABC". The Age. Retrieved 15 March 2021.

Firearms charges 2016

[edit]

In July 2016 Mick Gatto was found guilty of having a shotgun and ammunition. His defense was that he needed it for protection from the Columbians/others He was fined $2,500, plenty of current news sources but I have no idea how to do the wiki thing.

Only adding this comment because the above was why I actually checked his page. I was hoping for more info. 203.39.249.148 (talk) 04:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mick Gatto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:55, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mick_Gatto&oldid=1207234815"