Talk:Michipicoten (1952 ship)

Request for reassessment

Hi, I've blanked the {WikiProject Ships} template on this talk page for reassessment, because I feel that my expansions of several paragraphs and restructuring of the information chronologically and using subheadings is enough for it to meet the "Structure" section of the bottom three criteria for C-class article. Even if it does not get moved up to C-class, thank you for your time and effort in reviewing it again! --LiamUJ (talk) 16:24, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request Re-re assessment

Okay, I have requested reassessment for a second time. This is because I added a section about a description and fixed the grammar and citations to the best of my abilities. Also, the references have been significantly enhanced by Geo Swan. --LiamUJ (talk) 18:20, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

references

I transform bareurls to populated {{cite}} templates, and I put them in my preferred place - within the {{reflist}} template.

When a reference is already defined, using a {{cite}} template, and I think it needs more fields, or some other modification, I leave it wherever I found it, and in its original method.

Two references were defined multiple times - something we try not to do... Geo Swan (talk) 05:06, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Geo Swan: Okay, thanks for helping out and letting me know! --LiamUJ (talk) 11:13, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]