Talk:Michigan Wolverines men's basketball/GA2

GA Review

I think this is pretty good. A couple minor things:

The asterisks in the infobox need an explanation in the infobox so it's self-contained. Shouldn't count on people reading the lead
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 13:05, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In the "Players" section, is it normal to link headers in bullet lists? And add footnotes to them?
- I have delinked.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 12:56, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In the "Fab 5" section: King (3rd team, 1995, & honorable mention, 1993 *1994) - what does the asterisk go with?
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 12:45, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Frieder's resignation sounds a little more complicated: Frieder Is Dropped For Taking A New Job
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 13:11, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then a more general concern. The overall structure seems broken up by large tables. Could the "Fab 5" section be moved up to history? What about the "Ed Martin" section? I'm not sure what the ideal structure would be, but I tend toward having the tables at the end as appendices with explanation. Gimmetrow 06:06, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, this looks like it covers the major aspects of a sports team, although the history by coach seems sketchy; did if anything of note happen before the "Fab Five"? Gimmetrow 22:43, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]