Talk:Michigan Public/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Michigan Public. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
It would be very cool to include some data on ratings/# of listeners for Michigan Radio vs. commercial stations.
Perhaps this was meant to describe only the Michigan Radio stations, but as phrased the statement It is the only station that directly competes with another NPR member, in this case WGVU in Grand Rapids and WMUK in Kalamazoo. seems a little too sweeping. older ≠ wiser 18:12, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:MichiganRadiologo.gif
Image:MichiganRadiologo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 17:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
University of Michigan Project
University of Michigan is not represented with a project at Category:WikiProject Universities. Please comment at Talk:University_of_Michigan#Should_University_of_Michigan_have_a_project.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:03, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
competing with other stations
I removed unsourced material stating that only WVGR "competes" with other NPR affiliates. In contrast, there is signifant overlap between the signals of WUOM/WFUM and those of WDET (Detroit), WEMU (Ypsilanti), WKAR (East Lansing), and WGTE (Toledo). Throughout most of metropolitan Detroit it is possible to choose between all 6 signals, meaning that these four affiliates "compete" with Michigan Radio. Furthermore, since Arbitron no longer publishes an Ann Arbor book, Michigan Radio now "competes" for ratings in the Detroit Arbitron survey - stating that Ann Arbor and Detroit are separate radio markets is misleading at best.
It is correct that of the three, only WVGR shares a community of license with another NPR affiliate, but this is not the same as saying there is no direct competition among affiliates. Radio signals reach far beyond municipal boundaries. Mr. Swordfish (talk) 15:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Michigan Radio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513172828/http://pod.michiganradio.org/newsroom.asp to http://pod.michiganradio.org/newsroom.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060714175031/http://www.current.org/history/history0506pba.shtml to http://www.current.org/history/history0506pba.shtml
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060426120534/http://www.cpb.org/stations/reports/havingitall_radioreport_04.pdf to http://www.cpb.org/stations/reports/havingitall_radioreport_04.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070925223230/http://www2.state.ia.us/regents/Meetings/DocketMemos/04Memos/dec04/FinalReport.pdf to http://www2.state.ia.us/regents/Meetings/DocketMemos/04Memos/dec04/FinalReport.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Neutrality
The current article has a bunch of text that seem clearly added by someone who is still unhappy about the move away from classical music several decades ago ("In the wake of these brutal changes there was even a reported suicide at the station, while public outcry was firmly ignored by the station's pompous new director.", "Michigan Radio may have helped influence similarly terrible transitions to that format", "However, all trace of what the station once was in the 1980s and 1990s before this catastrophic take-over and re-organization have otherwise been buried, so that present-day listeners, researchers and others don't even have the opportunity to make a comparison.", etc.). I don't know enough about the subject to feel qualified editing these into something more neutral. Xiong Chiamiov ::contact:: help! 15:22, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
- I deleted those statements. See any others? TomCat4680 (talk) 05:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)