Jump to content

Talk:Michelin Guide/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

sorry my bad

Whoops, i somehow did an incorrect revert (by reverting back to vandalism) and then thought someone did just that when they indeed corrected it.

sorry to waste your time guys.

Gillis (talk) 17:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/11/23/091123fa_fact_colapinto (material was flagged on Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 September 16 and removed soon after. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:22, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Number of Restaurants

"(It should be noted, however, that Tokyo is home to 160,000 restaurants, versus New York's 25,000 and Paris's 13,000 .[2])"

I fail to see how this is at all relevant, especially as probably well over half of those "restaurants" in Tokyo are ramen shops, donut shops, and the like. Unless somebody can come up with a reason as to why the number of tokyo is an important factor here, other than as a feeble and unnecessary attempt to make Paris/Ny not look so bad by comparison, I strongly recommend this be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.7.16.244 (talk) 12:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Is the information about how many stars each city has really relevant to this article? Seems like a feeble and unnecessary attempt to stroke Tokyo's ego. --Mugsywwiii (talk) 08:25, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
"Jean-Luc Naret, director of the Michelin guides, dismissed such criticisms as unfair, saying Tokyo received more stars simply because it has more restaurants. He said Michelin’s five undercover judges in Tokyo, two Japanese and three Europeans, spent a year and a half sampling 1,500 restaurants." http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/24/business/worldbusiness/24guide.html?_r=2&hp&oref=slogin --Mugsywwiii (talk) 08:33, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Title

Shouldn't this be called "Michelin Red Guide"? Michelin also make green guides, which are general tourist information. Notinasnaid 12:43, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

On second thoughts, having examined some copies, what is it called? Many don't even have title pages. Notinasnaid 12:46, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I have a Michelin Guide in front of me right now.. this one is Blue, and is a combination of Maps, Hotels & Restaurants and Touristic Guide. Within the article the mention of the color red confused me.. would it be wise to state somewhere that the Michelin Restaurant Guide is traditionally Red? Oh, the title of this guide is 'De Grote Gids België' (The Big Guide Belgium). Kander 09:22, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Quite right. The distinction was lost when this article was split from the main Michelin article. I have tried to fix. Notinasnaid 10:24, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

The article currently implies that the term Michelin Guide is synonymous with Red Guide, but what about the other colours? How does the colour coding work exactly - is it red for both restaurants and hotels and green for travel and tourism, as the Michelin article says and ViaMichelin seems to show? Where does the blue come in if so, is it really green? Flapdragon 19:29, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

The Red Guides are the fat, squat guides to hotels and restaurants, published annually. The Green Guides are the thin, tall, narrow guides for travel and tourism, updated every few years. Michelin now has other series of guides as well. I don't know if any of those are blue colored, but none of them are called Blue Guides. There is an English-language Blue Guide series published in the UK by A & C Black and an unrelated French-language Guide Bleu series published by Hachette in France. I believe there was some editorial connection between the two of them many decades ago. --Macrakis 20:15, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
Besides the traditional Red and Green Guides, Michelin has recently introduced several new series: Guide Voyager Pratique 'Le guide pour les voyages sur mesure'; Guide Gourmand, 'Une sélection de restaurants typiques et de boutiques de bonne bouche'; Guide Escapade, 'Pour partir quelques jours découvrir un pays ou une ville'; Guide Coup de Coeur, 'Des hôtels et maisons d’hôte sélectionnés pour leur charme et leur caractère original'. I haven't seen them yet. --Macrakis 20:23, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, I've incorporated that info into the article, would value corrections. Flapdragon 16:24, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Please update the main Michelin article to remove redundant info about Red/Green/etc. guides and point to here. --Macrakis 22:47, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Edit request

"However, most news reports attributed this suicide to a downgrade by the rival Gault Millau guide" is a ridiculous statement and should be removed. The disease is probably what made the man kill himself, not the downgrade of his restaurang. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.114.164.229 (talk) 08:19, 10 November 2006‎ (UTC)

Point re world view

This tag was added:

It is true that the article reflects a European point of view. However, it is also the case that until 2006 they only covered Europe. In 2006, New York was added, but it too early too say what the effect of this would be. However, I don't think it would really be debated that the rating system was "probably the most influential in the world". So I will remove the tag, ok? Notinasnaid 17:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Has it influenced China? Japan? Dubai? the United States? Canada? Australia? The system is too Euro-centric to be the most influential "in the world". The article will be changed accordingly. - SigmaEpsilon → ΣΕ 20:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

The article does not say it has influenced elsewhere, only that it is the most influential. Is there any restaurant guide anywhere in the world that is as influential in its locale? Still, a statement this broad should be sourced; I will see if a source can be found. Notinasnaid 20:13, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
What a word game. Correct by the letters but completely incorrect in spirit (in other words, misleading).66.171.76.138 00:10, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
ΣΕ, I don't think the claim in the article is unreasonable. The New York Times is more important in New York than Michelin is in New York. But Michelin is more important in New York than the NYT is in Paris, for example. Similarly, on Iron Chef, they will mention Michelin-starred kitchens that contestants have worked in, but I don't think there's a local Japanese system that would mean anything to French people. Michelin is known around the world in a way that other guides aren't, even if it doesn't cover the whole world. In other words, if you don't think it's the most influential in the world, you should be able to say what guide is the most influential in the world. What's your pick? (That said, there's probably WP:V issues with the claim, so I agree it should be sourced.) -- Coneslayer 20:24, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
What kind of logic is this?? If you can't name another guide that is the most influential in the world, then let's just pick one that you feel everyone has heard of? That's like saying there is no world president so let's make the President of the United States the president of the world because every politician in the world has likely heard of him. The fact is that there is NO worldwide influential restaurant guide and to claim the Michelin is it is ridiculous.66.171.76.138 00:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Since noone has come up with an alternative pick for most influential guide in the world, I am removing the citation needed tag. I would consider removing the word 'probably' too. THJS

In fact, the entire statement was removed. How "influential" something is is enormously subjective. It even can be different per individual. You may find the Michelin Guide’s influence among fine diners in Paris but there are others that don’t know or care. Subjective claims like this are POV. I’m sure the people over at Gault Millau would have a different POV. Padillah (talk) 13:52, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Origin of the rating system

Found on http://www.beyond.fr/food/michelin-guide.html

"By 1920, the dining part had become so popular, Michelin established a team of anonymous inspectors, and started a new 3-category rating system for the restaurants. They took advertising out of the guide and began charging 7 francs for it. (Wikipedia says that a 1-star mark for good cooking was added in 1926, and the 3-category system began in the early 1930s."

Has anyone a source for the wiki version of the origin? --82.22.139.25 13:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

new statistics

i don't have the full numbers, but there's some recent guides which are not covered here, chicago now has only one 3-star restaurant, france 25 instead of 26 (which makes japan the one with most 3-stars!!!!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.30.251.6 (talk) 12:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Michelin_Guide/Archive_1&oldid=1241944040"