Jump to content

Talk:Michael Vassar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

update his picture?

[edit]

can you guys give him a cuter picture. he's just so cute. i don't think the one on his page really does a good service to how cute he is. he's one of the cutest and most likeable personalities and faces of transhumanism, and i think its worth playing up these qualities in transhumanists where they can be found. and michael vassar is a TOTAL qtpi. you can't say he's not. plus his picture is kind of out of date. especially for a transhumanist such as himself seven years is a long time. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buckwheatloaf (talkcontribs)

merge to MetaMed

[edit]

No biographical details are cited to verifiable third-party reliable sources, which is not up to standard for a WP:BLP that's been around six years. MetaMed is notable and has an article; suggest merging there - David Gerard (talk) 18:30, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No objections, merging - David Gerard (talk) 13:23, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notability and reliable sources

[edit]

I've reverted the notability and primary source tags. This NY Mag article, this article by Harper's, and Chapter 3 of Our Final Invention are all reliable secondary sources, and they all have large chunks dedicated to Vassar personally, which clearly establishes notability. IIRC, the current article content is all verifiable in these three sources, though it's possible I forgot some bits. Even if that weren't true, it's frequently OK to use self-published sources in BLPs (WP:BLPSELFPUB), though of course they don't contribute to notability. Spectra239 (talk) 09:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ehh, fair enough. That list of ref links does indeed need digesting into the article though - David Gerard (talk) 11:58, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Michael Vassar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

created by sock

[edit]

This article was created by now-blocked sock per this SPI Jytdog (talk) 11:41, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect back to MetaMed as it was? Merging whatever sensibly should be? - David Gerard (talk) 13:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a month, I've just culled all the dubious refs. We need verifiable third-party RSes for a BLP, then this stuff can be put back as we find it ... or the article can go back to MetaMed if that looks a better idea - David Gerard (talk) 23:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Last call before redirecting this puff piece back to MetaMed - David Gerard (talk) 17:17, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirected - David Gerard (talk) 08:35, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]