Talk:Michael R. Rose

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Biology Low‑importance

	Biology portal Michael R. Rose is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

There needs to be a disambiguation page for Michael Rose, because there is another Michael Rose (the Musician). I'm not familiar enough with the wikipedia procedures for doing it, however

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael R. Rose. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20010911094058/http://ecoevo.bio.uci.edu/Faculty/Rose/Rose.html to http://ecoevo.bio.uci.edu/Faculty/Rose/Rose.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:02, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Additional sources and questionable views

May whoever provided the line of description that Michael R. Rose believes in ageing ceasing after the force of natural selection reaches zero please provide their source? I know that Rose himself believes this based on interviews I've seen scattered about, but nothing solid to actually prove this. Placing some sources in there would be nice. I'm also interested in the claim that Rose believes that it'll be difficult to 'develop technology to postpone human aging', given that a quick Google search has yielded an interview from 2001 actually has him saying the complete opposite and that his experiments have convinced him of that. I'd like to see some sources showing he's changed his mind about that. If no one does it anytime soon, I'll go and edit that segment to reflect his actual views. I'll also add some sources at some point to show his opinions but if anyone gets around to it before I can, that'd be awesome.Lunamoo (talk) 18:26, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]