Talk:Michael Prawdin
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Slander?
I don't know to what extent Prawdin's work has a fascist strain or not, but a cursory review of his reputation suggests that over a long career he was regarded with some respect by solid, non-fascist scholars, though I do see his failure to provide footnotes noted. It is certainly not enough to say a Nazi praised one of his books and leave it at that. Fascism was syncretic and irrationally took bits and pieces from many thinkers, frequently perverting them. For example, Mussolini praised William James. AECwriter 17:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aecwriter (talk • contribs)
Start a discussion about improving the Michael Prawdin page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Michael Prawdin" page.
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Automatically assessed biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Russia articles
- Low-importance Russia articles
- Low-importance Stub-Class Russia articles
- Stub-Class Russia (science and education) articles
- Science and education in Russia task force articles
- Stub-Class Russia (history) articles
- History of Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles