Talk:Michael Pratt (GC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most recent?
[edit]Philip, can you clarify
- He is a recipient of the George Cross, and of all living recipients, his award is the most recent such to a civilian. The most recent award, and the most recent award to a living recipient, was to Trooper Christopher Finney in 2003.
- Who is the most recent recipient?
- Who is the most recent civilian recipient?
- Among those recipients who are civilians, who received the award last?
- Among those recipients who are still alive, who received the award last?
Also, can you perhaps supply when Pratt received the award? Thanks! -- Perfecto
- (1) Christopher Finney; (2) Stewart Graeme Guthrie; (3) Guthrie (isn't this the same question?); (4) Finney. Pratt's award was gazetted on 4 July 1978. -- Necrothesp 11:19, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
Then the sentence really should only read
- He is a recipient of the George Cross in 4 July 1978.
-- Perfecto 20:26, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
- No, it was perfectly accurate (although poorly worded). Guthrie's award was posthumous and Finney was (and is) not a civilian. -- Necrothesp 13:20, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- Are constables civilians (in Australia)? FYI, sentences cannot be accurate and poorly worded at the same time. :) -- Perfecto 18:59, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- Civilian, as in non-military. Are Australian police officers military police? No. Therefore, they are civilians. Yes, a sentence can be accurate (i.e. factually correct) and badly worded at the same time. -- Necrothesp 20:13, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
--PhilipIsPDR 16:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- I'm coming a little late to this (apologies) - but for what it's worth, hmph, I thought the sentence was clear enough. ;) Nonetheless, (not that it matters) I entirely approve of the alteration and the sentence as it stands now.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Michael Pratt (GC). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050215070336/http://www.gc-database.co.uk:80/recipients/PrattMK.htm to http://www.gc-database.co.uk/recipients/PrattMK.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:54, 9 January 2016 (UTC)