Jump to content

Talk:Michael Munger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

I have removed a proposed deletion template. I think Mike Munger is notable enough. He is the 99.9% certain nominee of his party for Governor in 2008. Barbara Howe, who was the Libertarian nominee last time, was deemed notable enough. Munger has also gotten press coverage, as in the News & Observer cited in the article, and in an interview with Frank Stasio on North Carolina Public Radio. Awbeal (talk) 19:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If someone wants to restore the Wikipedia:proposed deletion template, the text was:


{{dated prod|concern = [[WP:N|Non-notable]] academic who fails both [[WP:BIO#Politicians]] and [[WP:PROF]]|month = February|day = 14|year = 2008|time = 15:01|timestamp = 20080214150109}} <!-- Do not use the "dated prod" template directly; the above line is generated by "subst:prod|reason" -->

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Michael Munger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:06, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Michael Munger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Factual Errors Alleged by One in the Know

[edit]

Mr. Munger [argues| https://mungowitzend.blogspot.com/2019/12/buttigieg-gets-his-own-house-elf-at.html] that his article is error-filled and poorly sourced. I'm not a very good editor, as I'm probably demonstrating by failing to make a good link to his blog post. Is there someone disinterested who might work with him to improve the article? JimHarperDC (talk) 14:56, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was right! I'm a crap editor! :-D JimHarperDC (talk) 14:57, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox should be Economist Template

[edit]

The infobox should be changed from the scientist template to the economist template, I plan to come back to this but anyone else is welcome to take a crack at it Acgarretson (talk) 22:48, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]