Talk:Michael Jackson's This Is It/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: W.D. (talk · contribs) 12:39, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Maybe it isn't original research per se, but there is a lot of reference to the wishes of his fans which as I said, cannot be proven, and judging by the article, hasn't.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Seems to explain well enough the major aspects, also very detailed in places.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Neutral, shows multiple opinions on the film.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Stable,no recent controversies or anything.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Appropriate captions, free images where available.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Except some minor issues, this is generally a good article.
- Pass/Fail: