Talk:Michael Fertik
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Michael Fertik article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 31 March 2014. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
New York Times
[edit]In response to concerns about source quality, I have added three recent New York Times sources about the subject.Sunnymale (talk) 07:28, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
COI Disclosure
[edit]Consistent with the disclosure on my user page, I have a friendly or acquaintance relationship with the subject of this article. I have not been paid, directly or indirectly, but I am voluntarily disclosing this relationship out of an abundance of caution and transparency. I will update this disclosure in the unlikely event I am ever paid to edit on behalf of this subject.Sunnymale (talk) 07:28, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Sunnymale, please excuse my mess while I work on the article. I noticed that Forbes says that he quit his job as a court clerk to start his company, while The New York Times says that he was offered a new job in Washington that he turned down. Do you happen to know which is accurate (or maybe you can just ask him). CorporateM (Talk) 15:05, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
Misc
[edit]I have given the article a once-through, but I usually do not leave very detailed edit summaries when I am over-hauling an article. Happy to discuss any of the changes. I find that it is usually helpful to ask the article-subject if there are any errors (I have an anonymous email address I use for this purpose). I will wait to see if Sunny does so since they have a relationship. My initial impression was that this article was an obvious delete, so I am very glad Sunny was persistent in digging up sources. It turns out it would have been a big mistake to delete it.
PS - I will put it on my impossibly long list of To Dos that I may or may not ever do to do some work on Online reputation management. Maybe after History of public relations is GA. CorporateM (Talk) 15:45, 11 April 2014 (UTC)