Talk:Miami Limestone

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Miami Oolite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140731140924/http://fossilworks.org/ to http://www.fossilworks.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 May 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) DannyS712 (talk) 01:20, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Miami Oolite → Miami Limestone – Geologists have been moving to a new term Donald Albury 20:12, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many geologists are now calling this formation "Miami Limestone", as a more appropriate term than "Miami Oolite", in part because the bryozoan facies of the formation is not oolitic. The oolitic and bryozoan facies were deposited at the same time and adjacent to each other, so treating them as one formation under the broader name seems appropriate.

Sources that use "Miami Limestone" (sometimes specify that the older term was "Miami Oolite"):

Source that refers to "Miami oolite" as a facies of the "Miami Formation":

Alice Wainwright Park

Sources that refer to "Miami oolite" (lower case "oolite") as a facies of "Miami Limestone":

@Abyssal, Magioladitis, Hmains, and Waacstats: - I am proposing moving Miami Oolite to "Miami Limestone". As you have edited the article, I am asking for your input on the proposed move at Talk:Miami Oolite. - Donald Albury 20:12, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support per well-reasoned nom. bd2412 T 19:43, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.