Talk:Meyer Seewald
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Meyer Seewald redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 November 2014. The result of the discussion was Redirect to Jewish Community Watch#Founders. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Move JCW info to its own page
[edit]Page for the org has been created here. Please assist separating the founder from the org. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Biased Article
[edit]- This article is seems to be a promotion of Meir Seewalds organization. Thus not following wikipedia's Neutral point of view policy WP:NPV
Look at the history - you will see that any sourced edits that brought in articles discussing another side to the website was removed/re-written (for example the article about people that were put on the websites "wall of shame" and found innocent by law enforcement, or the published articles that condemn the idea of placing names of people before they were charged or arrested, and names of figures who condemn the website etc.)
- A second problem is that many of the sources promoting his organization come from his own website - not from secondary sources. Mrraktima (talk) 20:45, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
In addition, there is some WP:BLP problems with this article.
Seewald's organization may be justified for posting people that have never been charged or arrested - because of the nature of the community he is targeting. Wikipedia on the other hand has very strict rules in this matter that "A person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty and convicted by a court of law. For people who are relatively unknown, editors must give serious consideration to not including material in any article suggesting that the person has committed, or is accused of committing, a crime unless a conviction is secured." - WP:BLPCRIME
There are names of people in this article of people who (at least according to the sources) were not convicted.
Therefore as per wikipedia policy - at least the WP:BLP should be corrected/removed immediately by an editor that has knowledge in this subject. Mrraktima (talk) 20:45, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Suicide case
[edit]The article discusses about an unfounded suicide claim. However recently there was a confirmed case of a person on the site who was accused of molestation (and never convicted) who committed suicide. I am adding this to that section of the article. Caseeart (talk) 08:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC)