Talk:Mexifornia

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mexico

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Good start but needs to...conform to a higher standard of...conformity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.220.202.21 (talk • contribs)

Mexifornication

Maybe a new TV show about a mexican chica in Pico Rivera and a white dude in Venice beach? What say?

two subjects?

This article needs a disambig page. One for Mexifornia as a concept/expression, and one for the book called Mexifornia by Victor Davis Hanson. Pablobowden 19:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

who is "Hanson?"

This article makes frequent reference to someone named Hanson but it doesn't explain or link to who this person is --65.196.107.133 20:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rubbish

This page is absolute rubbish.

Firstly, are you talking about an English phrase or a book? Because you seemed to have mixed the two together.

Secondly, this article is completely biased and makes statements aboutwho the whole of the people on each side of the border feel. Stereotyping, bias and bald-faced lies.

Please clean it up and remove the all the rubbish and break it into two seperate articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivan Thomson (talk • contribs) 22:17, April 18, 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. -- Satori Son 22:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

I got the references to all appear as notes at the end of the article page, but I am not particularly enamored with the use of ref and note templates except in a stable NPOV article without anticipated changes. As is, anyone editing and wishing to insert a new ref|note combo must also adjust all of the following ref|note combos to make everything else match up. Also added a factual correction regarding Spanish conquest of New Spain, formerly implying that Spain went to war with itself. Appearances do count for something, so I'm glad the notes actually appear, but I will probably re-visit the ref|note combos and re-edit to make html-style ref insertions easier on future editors. Hotfeba 16:30, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nominate for deletion?

This neologism definition might have a better home on a dictionary if it ever catches on. In mainstream media, it's not used except in reference to the book, or a book about this book. Among Americans of Mexican descent, it's not used - there are other terms. Hotfeba 06:17, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It needs to be rewritten as an article on the Hanson Book Mexifornia: A State of Becoming. Wikipedia is not the place for neologisms.--Rockero 04:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. D.E. Cottrell (talk) 18:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mexifornia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070126203638/http://www.ailf.org/ipc/Mexifornia.asp to http://www.ailf.org/ipc/Mexifornia.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]