Jump to content

Talk:Mex

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is it possible to add a description relating to MEX codes assigned to investment funds, OIECs etc? 86.144.130.12 (talk) 15:26, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 21 February 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Silikonz💬 04:50, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]



MEXMex – The majority of terms are capitalised this way. An anonymous username, not my real name 23:51, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 19 August 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 05:17, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


MexMex (disambiguation) – The "Mex" title should redirect to the country Mexico, given the overwhelming common usage of "Mex" as an abbreviation for Mexico and the lack of usage of "Mex" for other topics.

"Mex" is a well-known abbreviation for Mexico in contexts like international sporting events (e.g., FIFA, Olympic Games), airport codes (MEX for Mexico City International Airport), and by global media outlets.

Commonly recognized abbreviations of countries or entities are redirected to the primary topic: USA redirects to the United States, UK redirects to the United Kingdom, and UAE redirects to the United Arab Emirates. Consistency in naming conventions makes it logical for "Mex" to redirect to Mexico, the most recognized association with the term.

Other uses of "Mex" would still be accessible to users who need them. A hatnote can be added to the top of the country’s article directing users for the other topics here:

Yovt (talk) 15:41, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Disambiguation has been notified of this discussion.
Yovt (talk) 15:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per WP:DPT, let's have a look at some statistics. WikiNav for Mex illustrates the incoming readership and clickstreams for last month (July '24), and it looks like there were a total of 316 views, and in turn we could identify 48 outgoing clicks to the airport and 19 to the country. That's just 15% and 6%, respectively, so it doesn't look like there's a primary topic by usage. The link to the proposed primary topic already seems to be quite prominent. Why would we think short-circuiting this would lead to better outcomes for the average reader? --Joy (talk) 17:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose other than 2 dictionary results no Google results appear to be for the country but the Wikipedia article Mex (mathematics) does come up. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose I simply don't see the nom's argument making sense. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 05:29, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – No primarytopic: Even if Mex is most commonly recognized as an abbreviation for Mexico, it can be the country, the state, the city, or the airport, among other things. USA and UK and UAE are acronyms, much less ambiguous (I do see USA spray painted on the streets a lot, where it means "underground service arrangement" or something like that, but for readers who aren't into that specialty, they going to think United States of America, pretty clearly; for Mex the first thing I though of was Tex-Mex food, but that's just me). Dicklyon (talk) 06:11, 22 August 2024 (UTC)\[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.