Talk:Metropolitan Railway/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Aviyal (talk · contribs) 18:35, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Review
[edit]- Well-written:
- Verifiable with no original research:
- Broad in its coverage:
- Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
- Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (prose) | The reviewer has no notes here. |  Pass
|
| (b) (MoS) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass
|
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (references) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass
|
| (b) (citations to reliable sources) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass
|
| (c) (original research) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass
|
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (major aspects) | The reviewer has no notes here. |  Neutral
|
| (b) (focused) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Neutral
|
| Notes | Result |
|---|---|
| The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass
|
| Notes | Result |
|---|---|
| The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass
|
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass
|
| (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass
|
Result
[edit]| Result | Notes |
|---|---|
| Pass |
The article is not biased or Broad in its coverage. But it's brilliantly written and I would say that it apply to most of the criteria and therefore is a winner |