Talk:Meteorological history of Hurricane Noel

Meteorological history of Hurricane Noel was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 28, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
July 11, 2013	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Meteorological history of Hurricane Noel/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Just a few grammar and MOS fixes are needed here:

(1-minute sustained) should be (sustained one minute).
Date format should be consistent throughout ("22 October" vs. "October 23")
"The low pressure area dropped heavy " dropped-->produced?
"By six hours after formation" remove By
"with some rainbands to its south" some-->several
"began paralleling the northeastern " paralleling-->moving parallel to
Make all times consistent throughout.

I believe the article meets the rest of the criteria. This will go on hold until you fix the above concerns. Good luck, Malinaccier (talk) 01:22, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

Why did this ever exist in the first place? Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 00:05, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

^_^ why merge a mid important article? BlueTropicalWave (Talk) 01:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's largely redundant from the main article (Hurricane Noel) Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 01:43, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok but in my opinion this is more detailed then the main article (hurricane Noel) BlueTropicalWave (Talk) 01:48, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It should not be low IMO. it's just some random Category 1 hurricane that nobody cares about and this is coming who is long for sub-articles. This article is quite short for an MH article. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 02:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So This Articke is a TPA (totally pointless article)? BlueTropicalWave (Talk) 02:30, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No article is totally pointless. Y E ^Pacific ^Hurricane 02:43, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok after reading it over again I now think it's short so I change my mind, this is a pretty pointless article. BlueTropicalWave (Talk) 08:00, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. It would not be unreasonable to include this article's contents into Hurricane Noel.--12george1 (talk) 03:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]