Talk:Meteorological Effects of Hurricane Felix (2007)

proposed canceling

Although my article, Meteorological Effects of Hurricane Felix (2007), may be similar to the article, Hurricane Felix, having another article, or means of information, would distribute more information throughtout wikipedia.Juliancolton 15:26, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you added a lot of new content after I put up the PROD, so I removed it again. It would probably be a good idea to limit the scope of the article the the meteorolgical effect, and make this a subpage of the Hurricane Felix (2007) article. If you need some help in doing that, just drop a note here, and I'll help you out. Martijn Hoekstra 15:31, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actualy, I rather mean a spinout, as not to be too confusing. Martijn Hoekstra 15:36, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do i create a spinout, or a subpage?Juliancolton 15:45, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The idea is that you start a new section in Hurricane Felix (2007), called Meteorological effects, and make it something like the following:

Meteorological effects

For more details on this topic, see Meteorological effects of hurricane Felix (2007)

this is a dummy text where a short summary of the meteorological effects would be.

This article then, starts out with:

main article: Hurricane Felix (2007)

This is a dummy text that represents the first line of your article.

Make sure to keep your spunout article completely on topic of the meteorological effects: There is already an article about the hurricane itself, and it is not a good idea to repeat that information.

Note that I changed the capitalisation to conform to the guidelines for article titles, I'll move this page to the correct capitalisation in a moment. Martijn Hoekstra 15:56, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will do that. Thanks for telling me what a subpage is. I am pretty new to wikipedia, and am still learning about the editing.Juliancolton 21:05, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected

I redirected it to the main article. There's nothing new here and there are no sources. --Core desat 02:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me why you have a reason to merge i page that i have writen before you merge it. This is the third article that you have merged, and i am not happy. Please, if you have a reason to merge, delete, split, or anything else, discus it on the talk page first. Juliancolton 13:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't merge it. There is nothing here that is not in the main article and there are no sources - those are the reasons. --Core desat 04:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]