Jump to content

Talk:Metallica (album)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Petergriffin9901 (talk message contribs count logs email)

Fail - This article is being quick failed for obvious lack of preparation for GA.

  • Many unreliable sources; #s 7, 8, 30, 42
  • All are missing accessdates, and the ones that have them, are inconsistent
  • Many are in numerical form, while some appear 03-12-02 style
  • All sources are poorly and inconsistently formatted; many missing works/publishers/dates/authors etc.
  • Many MoS violations and poor and awkward paragraphing
  • Whats with the source for the credits? Make it encyclopedic.
  • Major lack of content; this is one of their most definitive albums, yet you have three major reviews? I could get more for a Kesha album
  • Very Bias article, struggling with NPOV issues; "Rolling Stone delivered a perfect 5-star review" -> we aren't fools, you don't need to tell us perfect
  • The tours section seems like a comulative piece of information regarding several tours and albums throughout the years. Nothing to the point or relevant
  • The lead is, forgive me, poor. Instead of failry summarizing the entire article's contents, it lists its commercial achievements and nothing more

I appreciate the effort, but this article is barely a C-class. Its in need of major clean-up and expansion. Good luck with that.--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 01:16, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]