This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles
Metal Storm (webzine) is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.EstoniaWikipedia:WikiProject EstoniaTemplate:WikiProject EstoniaEstonia articles
More content is being added. Please forgive me for not following the conventions of adding an article. I already tried to add something to prove notability.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jupitreas (talk • contribs) 14 September 2008 (UTC)
It is stated in a couple of places that reviews from Metal Storm editors are "professional", whilst user-submitted ones are not and feature a disclaimer. Given that Metal Storm is not a commercial site, I think that needs clarification... are the editors professional music journalists outside of Metal Storm, i.e. they are paid as music journalists for a commercial print magazine or newspaper? Because if not, the claim of professionalism is at best extremely misleading. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 14:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the three year old notability disclaimer. Metal Storm has been accepted as professional review site in March 2011 (discussion about it here), so I guess any notability concerns can be considered as void. Promonex (talk) 19:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]