Talk:Metal–organic framework
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the MOFs for catalysis page were merged into Metal–organic framework on August 28, 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ja9young.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Carbon dioxide capture
[edit]Since it hasn't been covered yet in this article, I'm planning on adding a section under "Additional potential applications" about the potential of MOFs to capture carbon dioxide out of flue gas Jesikatrese (talk) 03:58, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Artificial Photosynthesis
[edit]I would like to add a section under "additional potential application" of MOFs being utilized in artificial photosynthesis, specifically as the light-harvesting/capturing system. Ja9young (talk) 06:22, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
- You received a message about sources. Please cite only reviews and textbooks.--Smokefoot (talk) 07:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Why Wikipedia emphasizes secondary and tertiary references for MOFs
[edit]According to Chemical Abstracts:
- 32486 articles, patents, reports discuss MOF's
- 1691 of these articles are reviews
- 1089 reviews in English have appeared since 2012
THAT is the pool of articles that we should be citing. Otherwise editors risk using Wikipedia for a technical journal (see WP:NOTJOURNAL), or a forum for promoting their own work (see WP:COI). Remember, Wikipedia is not Chemical Reviews, it presents an overview. @JuliusEvola:@ZSchulte:@Ccm57: --Smokefoot (talk) 19:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
MOF vs Coordination Polymer
[edit]This article needs to do a better job of distinguishing between the two. At what point can a material be called a MOF? FSeg500 (talk) 13:56, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- This is clearly stated and referenced in the first paragraph. LRO 18:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lrohrstrom (talk • contribs)