Jump to content

Talk:Metadata standard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ISO 15489

[edit]

Deleted ISO 15489 because it is not a metadata standard. Both parts of the standard refer repeatedly to metadata, but do not define it. MarcMFresko (talk) 03:45, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Describing Archives: a Content Standard

[edit]

Should Describing Archives: a Content Standard ([1]) be included? It's used in tandem with EAD and is technically a metadata standard. But it's not a metadata encoding or structure standard. Ruthbrarian (talk)

This Page's Definition of Metadata Standard is Unclear

[edit]

In fact, the question about DACS raises the larger point of whether this page should do some kind of disambiguation between metadata encoding/structure standards and metadata content standards.[1] MARCXML, for example, encodes metadata that should comply with the RDA standard or the older AACR2 standard. EAD documentation recommends DACS compliance. Required elements for a valid EAD XML document and required DACS elements are not a 1:1 overlap, since the former is concerned with encoding and the latter with content. Some metadata encoding standards are meant for raw metadata that doesn't have a particular standard (e.g. TEI, which is really more text encoding than metadata encoding, one can hardly call Shakespeare's works "metadata" and yet that's one of the primary TEI examples). Ruthbrarian (talk) 12:39, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Metadata standard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:15, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article makes a massive omission of not listing SDMX

[edit]

SDMX is probably the most popular metadata standard next to DDI among official statistics agencies and beyond. sdmx.org; Any objections to add it to the table and reference https://sdmx.org/ ? Gyomaigy (talk) 14:45, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]