Jump to content

Talk:MetaTrader 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

API

[edit]

The API and bridge options associated with MT4 are very important but are completely left out.Mister Mormon (talk) 02:16, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge MetaQuotes Software here

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to not merge Sargdub (talk) 04:25, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MetaQuotes Software doesn't seem to be notable. As it has more info about the MetaTrader 4 then this article, I suggest merging that article to this one. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 22:11, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • The products of MetaQuotes Software (MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, TeamWox) are different. MT4 is only for Forex market, MT5 is for Forex and stock markets. MT5 written from scratch. So programming languages MQL4 and MQL5 ​​aren't inherited. And TeamWox is a business management system for SMB (ERP). Rather, each of them (mt4, mt5, teamwox) easier to create your page - Renat.Shafigullin (talk) 22:43, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not really sure I understand you, but it seems you don't get my point: the MetaQuotes Software article is about the MetaQuotes Software Corp, a company. This company is not (yet, probably) notable. If MetaTrader 5 and TeamWox are also not notable, probably no articles should cover them. Still I believe that the quality of MetaTrader 4 and 5 coverage would be greatly improved if this article would be devoted to both versions explaining the difference between them. The article could also give a short company background and a note about TeamWox. Your interest in getting some publicity for these products will be satisfied most by this option, as the separate pages will always be challenged: the notability for each of them is not (and probably can't be to date) established. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 23:10, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dmitrij, I disagree with you. Why do think MetaQuotes Software Corp. is not notable? I've included 13 notable links in the article. Also MetaQuotes is a world leader in its market segment. I think this should be enough to ensure that the company mentioned in the Wiki. Also I've added links of two wonderful interviews: "Interview with Metaquotes – Lenar Fatkhullin" by Forex Magnates and "Exclusive interview with Alexander Saidullin, Director of Trading Platform Development at MetaQuotes" by FX Trader Magazine - Renat.Shafigullin (talk) 12:13, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your links are about the products, not the company. It is an issue with implied inherited notability. See these examples on how do the references supporting company's notability look like: [1], [2], [3]. Hope you see the difference: when the source describes the software by company, it proves notability of software, when the company on its own is described, it proves notability of the company. None of the references you've added don't describe MetaQuotes Software Corp itself, so they don't serve the purpose of establishing notability. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 14:01, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am a consultant in the forex industry and MT4 is very well known. MT5 is quite a different product despite masquerading as a descendant of MT4 (probably just to leverage the good will around the company's other product). An article about MetaTrader with a section about differences between the versions really won't make sense. If we keep separate articles for MT4 and MT5, then I don't see how you would merge the Metaquotes article into either one. I think the best solution here is separate articles for MT4, MT5, and Metaquotes. If any of those are deemed not notable enough for an article (i.e. Metaquotes) then its article can be removed, but a merger doesn't make sense. Bigmantonyd (talk) 20:17, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. Moreover, all three appear to be notable enough. But it can be difficult to write all three articles without to much repetition and with little links that could be considered spammy.Enivid (talk) 22:51, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Comment

[edit]

Meta Trade 4 This software is online, cash , gold , oil . Software sold 0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aungkyawthet(YE) (talk • contribs) 05:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on MetaTrader 4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:36, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:MetaTrader_4&oldid=1238144642"