Talk:MetaMed

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on MetaMed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article seems a bit rosy

I was approached by a Metamed director looking for investment when Metamed at an early stage. It was immediately obvious to me that the company would never get anywhere, although it would have eaten up any money they could get from me if I had been foolish enough to invest. Metamed's promotion of personalized clinical trials was laughable, and the idea that graduate students and PhDs in math/physics were qualified to give medical advice struck me as dubious. Now that it has failed, I am curious to know whether Metamed ever had a single customer. 60.250.123.228 (talk) 04:47, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MetaMed was hilariously terrible, but Wikipedia is constrained to the RSes. I think the Vassar quote is pretty amazing though - David Gerard (talk) 14:08, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another obvious sign that things smelled of long-dead fish was the involvement of Alex Wissner-Gross. 60.250.123.226 (talk) 13:54, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Metamed home page with the equations for the free quantum field on a blackboard also stank. Some people without PhD's worship people with PhDs, to the point of handing over their money for any smelly scam. 60.250.123.226 (talk) 13:56, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I remember scouring the net for every RS on MetaMed I could find at the time ... - David Gerard (talk) 14:33, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]