Talk:Mesh (scale)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Untitled
[edit]The table of mesh size conversion is not entirely accurate. Also, several other standards exist for mesh size, which are not mentioned here. They are: Canadian, German, British, and French.
Column Headers in the "Sieve size conversion chart"
[edit]<Nmagedman> The "Sieve size conversion chart" has columns labeled BSS, Tyler, and US. Tyler is described in the article, but BSS and US are not. Could someone please describe those systems? Further, the article describes FEPA scales, but they are not included in the chart. Would someone please add them? Thanks! 17:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Tyler mesh size
[edit]I have removed the sentence: "The openings of adjacent mesh sizes in this series differ by a factor of ", because it is unclear whether this is correct and what exactly is meant by it. 7:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
grit sizes?
[edit]I was missing grit sizes of [http://www.amazon.com/50000-Grit-Diamond-Powder-Vial/dp/B002I9RQAI/ 50000] and [http://www.amazon.com/100000-Grit-Diamond-Powder-Vial/dp/B002I9RSCO/ 100000]? They seem to be explained here, although it's not a really good source, it was much less confusing to read than the article - I am still not sure how the information there goes together with the multitude of dimensions in the article Iridos (talk) 00:21, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Request for a table of typical grit sizes
[edit]It would be helpful to have a list or a table of some common materials and their mesh sizes; for example, beach sand, household cleanser, etc. In other words, what mesh sizes would these materials typically pass through, just to get a rough idea? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WWriter (talk • contribs) 19:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mesh (scale). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5tniA8uFh?url=http://www.nexlab.ru/files/equipment/spec.pdf to http://www.nexlab.ru/files/equipment/spec.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)