Jump to content

Talk:Mesfin Woldemariam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

The statement 'who has been actively engaged in a peaceful movement to bring justice, equality and peace for all the people in his country' seems to be to be an example of systemic bias that perhaps could be reworded slightly better by someone who understands the content more than I do. Bobadillaman (talk) 20:49, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Mesfin Woldemariam/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Professor Mesfin was not fired by EPRDF. The involvement of Prof Andreas in the firing process is simply a fabricated story. I don't know why such naked lies are posted on such respected website. Bye

Last edited at 07:19, 5 September 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 23:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mesfin Woldemariam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:42, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Second paragraph cites no sources

[edit]

It is important to cite sources, especially for articles where the facts are disputed. The second paragraph contains strong, controversial claims, but cites no sources. This must be changed. Pete unseth (talk) 13:21, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]