Talk:Mesa, Washington

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Current events

I removed the paragraph about the PRA lawsuit. While it is certainly noteworthy in the cummunity in the context of current events, it falls ouside the scope of this article for two reasons. First it is not encyclopedic in nature. Second the paragraph as written clearly violates the NPOV rule. Please dont get me wrong, i find as much outrage anyone else in the ruling - but it just doesnt have a place in this article. Removed text below. Nothingofwater (talk) 18:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The city of Mesa has been in the news and is the poster child for how harsh Washington State's Public Records Act can be. After a long court battle, Mesa was found to have violated the Act, so the truely sympathetic trial court had to impose a $230,000 judgment against the city. For a single Public Records Act lawsuit. This is around 2/3s of the city's annual operating budget. ($540 per resident, $2100 per household) http://www.tri-cityherald.com/kennewick_pasco_richland/story/289557.html

I added back a Current Events section with a short NPOV section on the litigation. It is a significant event related to Mesa and should be included. Proxy User (talk) 23:00, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mesa, Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]