Talk:Mersey and Irwell Navigation

UK Waterways Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Waterways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Waterways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK WaterwaysWikipedia:WikiProject UK WaterwaysTemplate:WikiProject UK WaterwaysUK Waterways articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greater Manchester Low‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cheshire Low‑importance

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Mersey and Irwell Navigation map.

name

I would suggest this be moved to "Mersey and Irwell Navigation" - what is Wikipedia's policy on naming articles? Parrot of Doom (talk) 21:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 21:38, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree too - I will try to do it. – ukexpat (talk) 20:11, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The alternate title already exists as a redirect Mayalld (talk) 20:15, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well I can ask an admin to make the move for us if there is consensus to do so. Anyone object? – ukexpat (talk) 20:56, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

None whatsoever from me. Mayalld (talk) 05:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okey dokey I will request the move. - ukexpat (talk) 19:26, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done - ukexpat (talk) 21:55, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest this article be taken out of 'Rivers of Lancashire', considering that it runs through Greater manchester and Cheshire and isn't a river.

JemmyH.92.239.71.235 (talk) 22:31, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mersey and Irwell Navigation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828223313/http://www.pittdixon.go-plus.net/m%26i-nav/m%26i-nav.htm to http://www.pittdixon.go-plus.net/m%26i-nav/m%26i-nav.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]