Talk:Mersen

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Updates as part of a paid contribution

Dears,

Mersen contacted me to propose me to update the information of his page for a fee. I also proceeded to a complete rewriting of the Market & Products sections which was not written in an encyclopedic style and I removed the essential (lists of activities). I deleted the entire section on governance (lists of people without notoriety). I have added several secondary sources. I removed the references in the introduction to wikify.

I propose to remove the WP:COI banner, as the entire page has been reworked to be as neutral in tone as possible. If there are still problematic elements, I remain available here or on my talk page.

Regards, NDrbs (talk) 14:09, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One of the reasons for deleting the maintenance template is the following (:

(associated with the neutral point of view policy) strongly recommend that the tagging editor initiate a discussion (generally on the article's talk page) to support the placement of the tag. If the tagging editor failed to do so, or the discussion is dormant, and there is no other support for the template, it can be removed".

However, no one has opened a discussion on this subject for 2 years, and no one has come forward to object to this subject. So I deleted this template. I am of course open to any discussion on this subject if someone finds it inappropriate. NDrbs (talk) 20:09, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]