Talk:Mersea Fort
Mersea Fort has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 5, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Mersea Fort/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 10:14, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
GA criteria
[edit]With a few minor grammatical tweaks made, the article complies with MOS policies for grammar, as well as its general layout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
The article uses a fairly sizable variety of reputable sources. Nothing resembles original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:01, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
- (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
- (c) it contains no original research
The article seems to cover all available encyclopedic aspects of its topic. No trivial or crufty content. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:00, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
- (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
The article maintains a neutral approach to its subject. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:59, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Since its creation last month, the article has not been subjected to edit warring. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:35, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
All three images used are relevant to the article. All of them are accepted by the Wikimedia Commons, so there is no risk of fair use violation. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:35, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
- (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
Upon reading over this article, I believe it satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 10:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class fortifications articles
- Fortifications task force articles
- GA-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- GA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- GA-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles