Jump to content

Talk:Merrily We Roll Along (play)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Split article

[edit]

I split the play and musical into two articles, and User:ConoscoTutto recombined them without any discussion. Please see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merrily We Roll Along (musical). What is the consensus? -- Ssilvers 21:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You split the article without any discussion, so please don't try to make it look I did something wrong. There was no logical reason for you to split it in the first place and leave the article about the original play only a few sentences long. ConoscoTutto 21:08, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, blocked User:SFTVLGUY2, I see that you are back to your bad old ways, now posting as User:ConoscoTutto. -- Ssilvers 21:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ssilvers, you should just respond to the discussion instead of making rash accusations (and be sure you know you're talking about before you make them). I have received E-mails about you from four editors involved with the musical theatre project and all of them were very similar, so I think you're the one with the problem, not me or anyone else. I'm going to take their advice and ignore you as much as possible. Thank you. ConoscoTutto 21:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As posted elsewhere, I support maintaining separate entries for MWRA the play and the musical. --RayBirks 21:59, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As posted elsewhere [1], I think having an article about the play that is only a few sentences long doesn't make sense. Thank you. ConoscoTutto 22:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is, of course, plenty that could be said about the 1934 Broadway play Merrily we Roll Along. By combining the two articles, you discourage editors from adding information to the article about the Broadway play. This is how Wikipedia works - An editor begins an article, and then other editors can expand it. Plus, I had separated the various links between the play and the musical, and you are trying to undo all that work. -- Ssilvers 22:22, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel there is "plenty that could be said about the 1934 Broadway play," then why didn't you say it when you divided the article? If you had, there'd be no discussion about the matter. I don't think anyone should claim there's "plenty" to say if he or she isn't prepared to say it and create a complete article instead of one with just a few lines. ConoscoTutto 22:43, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mwraflyer.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Mwraflyer.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:54, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Merrily We Roll Along (play). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Merrily We Roll Along (play). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]