Talk:Mercury Marquis
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
V8
[edit]Was the 302 actually available in the Midsize Marquis? My info says that the V8 was only in the 1985 LTD LX. I have never found any other LTD or Marquis with a factory V8. --Sable232 21:17, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Never mind. There was a very, very rare Marquis LTS model sold only in Canada that had the 302 setup just like the LTD LX. --Sable232 22:54, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Added info
[edit]Some of the sections are a little sparse, but I'm not sure how well I wrote this to begin with and I didn't want to make it awkward with useless info. Suggestions? If anyone can find good, high-quality pictures, that would help a lot.
Also, does anyone know if the 255 Windsor was used in the Marquis? The LTD got it, but the Merc may have ben high-end enough to have been spared the agony. --Sable232 21:41, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Page layout explained
[edit]The way I have this set up, there is a separate "Infobox Automobile" for the fullsize and midsize models, because it was simpler to do it that way. The information pertaining to all full-size generations can be kept separate from the Fox-body car. Also, I feel that articles look pretty bad when the generation infoboxes don't come close to lining up with their sections of text. The goal is to keep the infoboxes as short as possible. --Sable232 04:40, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:1972 Marquis 4dr.jpg
[edit]
Image:1972 Marquis 4dr.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 09:01, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
1973-78 section surveys
[edit]The source for these surveys is a pair of Mercury advertisements; given the nature of such "tests," the results do not necessarily reflect the actual preferences of consumers. I don't know Wikipedia's policy on such matters, but should those statements be removed from the article?
Fair use rationale for Image:1979 Grand Marquis coupe.jpg
[edit]Image:1979 Grand Marquis coupe.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Image listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion
[edit]File:1979 Grand Marquis coupe.jpg has been listed at files for deletion, please comment here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Change?
[edit]Am I going to be allowed to make changes on this page? If so I can contribute a lot, as much as my previous record demonstrates. If you hold me mute, I'll obviously contribute nothing. Sadowski (talk) 11:43, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mercury Marquis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120324110512/http://www.automobile-catalog.com/make/mercury/marquis_1978/marquis_1978/1979.html to http://www.automobile-catalog.com/make/mercury/marquis_1978/marquis_1978/1979.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:45, 26 January 2018 (UTC)