Talk:Mercury-Atlas 6

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Spaceflight High‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: History Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history.

Cold War

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 20, 2009.

Move (2006)

I have proposed that all Mercury missions are re-named. This will affect this page. So they can be discussed together on one page, I've set up a subpage of my user talk page for discussion of the moves. --GW_Simulations_{|User Page | Talk | Contribs | E-mail} 20:42, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fireflies

The "fireflies" were urine droplets vented out of the spacecraft. If I can find a citation for this I will include it in the article, but if anyone else has it, feel free to go ahead. None of this is in my areas of interest.--Buckboard 23:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

The "fireflies" were not urine droplets vented out, that's a myth, possibly perpetuated by the scene in the movie Apollo 13. John Glenn's memoir covers this. In fact, his memoir covers a few other things that challenge some of the facts stated in this article. Can someone pls add in-line sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.146.176.24 (talk) 12:17, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's correct, if I recall, Glenn's memoir only mentions the "fireflies", and no apparent cause. Waste products from the astronauts may not have been designed for venting for Mercury anyway, due to the relatively short flights. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.53.232.146 (talk) 23:44, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should be added

Mention should be made of the intense media & popular interest this mission received as it was the U.S. (and "free world"'s) first successful manned orbiting mission.... and also of the controversy regarding mission control's unwillingness to disclose all their concerns to Glenn about the possible landing bag deployment at the time. This is covered in his memoir also. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.146.176.24 (talk) 12:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Number in parentheses indicates number of spaceflights by each individual prior to and including this mission.

"Number in parentheses indicates number of spaceflights by each individual prior to and including this mission."

I know that someone has been applying this template to spaceflight mission articles, but in this case it seems a bit bureaucratic to add this, as, being the US's first manned spaceflight, the number is and can be only 1. - Aprogressivist (talk) 11:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possible plagiarism problems need to be addressed

The bulk of this article appears to be plagiarized from source material, judging from its style and tone (and consistency of editing). Could someone please check the current article against the sources it lists? Perhaps good paraphrasing (and citing) would address the problem, if the information was indeed lifted verbatim from the listed sources, or from others unlisted. Memetics (talk) 19:54, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Be aware that works of NASA are generally in the public domain. See {{NASA}}. There are however many good reasons for adding plentiful source citations, and this article would certainly benefit from them. (sdsds - talk) 20:27, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First US Astronaut to eat in space

Hey, I'm not a wikipedia guy so I don't know how to add this, but if someone could...John Glenn was the first US Astronaut to eat in space (from a tube, per the NASM):

https://airandspace.si.edu/exhibitions/apollo-to-the-moon/online/astronaut-life/food-in-space.cfm

"First Meal in Space

John Glenn was the first American to eat in space aboard Friendship 7 in 1962. At that time it was not known if ingestion and absorption of nutrients were possible in a state of zero gravity. Glenn's consumption of applesauce, packed in a tube, and xylose sugar tablets with water, demonstrated that people could eat, swallow, and digest food in a weightless environment.

Mercury space food of the early 1960s was based on Army survival rations, and consisted of pureed food packed into aluminum tubes and sucked through a straw. While Glenn and the other Mercury astronauts experienced no problems in chewing, drinking, swallowing, or digesting, the food was not considered very delicious.

Beef and Vegetables

This spacefood package containing pureed beef and vegetables was issued to John Glenn for consumption during his Friendship 7 flight in February 1962. Spacefood for the Mercury missions was placed in tube form to enable the astronauts to squeeze it directly into their mouths."

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.204.25.125 (talk) 01:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Technical accuracy of film dramatization

An editor recently added Hidden Figures to the film dramatization section. I just saw this film; it's very good, but contains a few technical inaccuracies for the sake of drama, one of which is inaccurately saying (in words on-screen at the end) that Glenn's flight was intended to last for seven orbits but was cut short to three because of the erroneous heat-shield indication. As this page notes, that is incorrect; although Glenn was "go for at least seven orbits" (meaning that was at least how long his orbit would last in the absence of retro fire), the program was conducted cautiously and it was only ever intended for him to make the three orbits.

This is verifiable by the Kenneth Gatland book Manned Spaceflight. (It also stands to common sense: Carpenter's following flight also made only three orbits, and Schirra's flight progressed to only six. If seven had been Glenn's goal, surely they would have been tried again on Carpenter's flight, and Schirra would have tried even more than six.) I think the erroneous reference to seven orbits should be noted here; this enhances the reader's encyclopedic understanding of the dramatic representation, and makes the reference to the movie more than just another trivia reference. (It should also be added to the Hidden Figures page, along with a few other minor technical and historical inaccuracies.) Would anyone have heartburn with me adding the number-of-orbits issue here? JustinTime55 (talk) 17:15, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if the 7 orbits was just misspoken, or taken from source material The Right Stuff (the movie), or the novel? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.53.232.146 (talk) 23:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mercury-Atlas 6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090525123504/https://mira.hq.nasa.gov/history/ws/hdmshrc/all/main/DDD/16286.PDF to https://mira.hq.nasa.gov/history/ws/hdmshrc/all/main/DDD/16286.PDF

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How many fragments?

In the "Spacecraft location" section, there's no explanation why the "fragment" found in South Africa becomes the plural "fragments" or why, in the second-to-last sentence of the section, both singular and plural forms are used.

This either needs to be explained, clarified, and/or corrected. 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 06:16, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's hard to do that when it isn't even cited per (WP:VERIFY) I'm moving it here until a citation can be found:

On February 21, 1962, a metal fragment was recovered on a farm near Aliwal-North, South Africa. It was identified as coming from the MA-6 Atlas launch vehicle by numbers stamped on it. The fragment had landed on the farm after about eight hours in orbit. The fragments were recovered by the police and handed over to NASA, which returned it as a token of goodwill. The fragments are today on display in the Science Museum in Pretoria.

JustinTime55 (talk) 14:56, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictory info

The apogee mentioned in the "Parameters" section contradicts the apogee in the infobox. In the infobox it says 248 km while in "Parameters" it says 248 nautical miles, that's almost twice as high. Also, in the "Reentry" section it's written that the drogue chute deployed at 28,000 ft while in the list "Flight" 22,000 ft are written. Glasfaser Wien (talk) 12:14, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Downgrade

This is really a "C" article. Lots of good info, but huge swathes are uncited. Someday we'll do the Mercury flights right. :) I am going through adding "Naming" sections. --Neopeius (talk) 03:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]